<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NNSI - NetNagel Stock Index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netnagel.com/2007/09/nnsi-netnagel-stock-index.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netnagel.com/2007/09/nnsi-netnagel-stock-index.html</link>
	<description>News and Photos of Eric, Laura, Jason, Becca, Morgan, Scout and Twitch Nagel.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.netnagel.com/2007/09/nnsi-netnagel-stock-index.html#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netnagel.com/2007/09/nnsi-netnagel-stock-index.html#comment-2120</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I don't remember the list of the 10 that I tried.  However, the other day, I looked at the Yahoo stock screener and chose all stocks &gt; $15 with a buy rating (1), then ran them (77 of them) through my algorithm, and came up with a list of the top picks.

This isn't bullet-proof (for example, RIMG only has 1 analyst covering it, so the opinion isn't very broad), but here are the top ones:

    [TM] =&gt; 274.459763017
    [RIMG] =&gt; 256.793940887
    [DXPE] =&gt; 214.928
    [CRH] =&gt; 160.559023729
    [AIB] =&gt; 152.779996557
    [CAJ] =&gt; 128.355086159
    [AGL] =&gt; 108.896551724
    [CORE] =&gt; 108.615384615
    [KEP] =&gt; 105.033044624
    [BBOX] =&gt; 103.102941176
    [DLA] =&gt; 102.248979592
    [ATLS] =&gt; 100.728205128
    [KHD] =&gt; 100.580226608
    [PHX] =&gt; 94.05
    [AAON] =&gt; 92.9772972973

Now you have a short-list of potentially well-performing stocks.  Research them yourself, then go buy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I don&#8217;t remember the list of the 10 that I tried.  However, the other day, I looked at the Yahoo stock screener and chose all stocks > $15 with a buy rating (1), then ran them (77 of them) through my algorithm, and came up with a list of the top picks.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t bullet-proof (for example, RIMG only has 1 analyst covering it, so the opinion isn&#8217;t very broad), but here are the top ones:</p>
<p>    [TM] => 274.459763017<br />
    [RIMG] => 256.793940887<br />
    [DXPE] => 214.928<br />
    [CRH] => 160.559023729<br />
    [AIB] => 152.779996557<br />
    [CAJ] => 128.355086159<br />
    [AGL] => 108.896551724<br />
    [CORE] => 108.615384615<br />
    [KEP] => 105.033044624<br />
    [BBOX] => 103.102941176<br />
    [DLA] => 102.248979592<br />
    [ATLS] => 100.728205128<br />
    [KHD] => 100.580226608<br />
    [PHX] => 94.05<br />
    [AAON] => 92.9772972973</p>
<p>Now you have a short-list of potentially well-performing stocks.  Research them yourself, then go buy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.netnagel.com/2007/09/nnsi-netnagel-stock-index.html#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 05:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netnagel.com/2007/09/nnsi-netnagel-stock-index.html#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>How did the others fair?  Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did the others fair?  Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
